<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attention Doomsayers: PS3 Is Not Dying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gamer20.com/2009/01/doomsayers-ps3-not-dying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gamer20.com/2009/01/doomsayers-ps3-not-dying/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:49:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyP</title>
		<link>http://blog.gamer20.com/2009/01/doomsayers-ps3-not-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gamer20.com/?p=1227#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>Granted, no one foresaw the economic crises we&#039;re in now way back when the PS3 was released. I do think it was a mistake though since it abandoned the principles that made the PS2 successful. 
 
While the site is under construction, a copy of my editorial&quot;The Fall of Sony: From #1 to (Barely) #2&quot;,  on it is still around at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gamer20.com/features/347,&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.gamer20.com/features/347,&lt;/a&gt; here&#039;s the basic gist: 
 
&quot;What&#8217;s ironic is that it was Microsoft who trumpeted the strategy with the original Xbox that inspired the strategy of the PlayStation 3. Rather than release slightly worse hardware at a lower price, Sony invested millions into its Cell processor technology and all of the other components that caused the PS3 to retail as high as $599 at one point. Sadly, even with the high price Sony was still selling them at a loss. 
 
What&#8217;s unfortunate for Sony from a business perspective is that it got so caught up in a graphical penis-measuring contest with Microsoft, that it lost sight of the fact that it didn&#8217;t need a multi-core, 8 SPE pixel generating doomsday device. That&#8217;s not how it won the last console war and it&#8217;s why that even in the event they stay on course to take the #2 position behind Nintendo, they will still have lost this generation.  
 
Now it&#8217;s reasonable to assume that at least a fair percentage of the 140 million PS2 owners were &#8220;light&#8221; owners, buying the occasional game here and there, but in this generation have opted for the Wii to fulfill those gaming needs. What Sony did, however, was totally alienate that consumer, and now it&#8217;s feeling the pain. &quot; 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted, no one foresaw the economic crises we&#039;re in now way back when the PS3 was released. I do think it was a mistake though since it abandoned the principles that made the PS2 successful. </p>
<p>While the site is under construction, a copy of my editorial&quot;The Fall of Sony: From #1 to (Barely) #2&quot;,  on it is still around at <a href="http://www.gamer20.com/features/347," rel="nofollow">http://www.gamer20.com/features/347,</a> here&#039;s the basic gist: </p>
<p>&quot;What&rsquo;s ironic is that it was Microsoft who trumpeted the strategy with the original Xbox that inspired the strategy of the PlayStation 3. Rather than release slightly worse hardware at a lower price, Sony invested millions into its Cell processor technology and all of the other components that caused the PS3 to retail as high as $599 at one point. Sadly, even with the high price Sony was still selling them at a loss. </p>
<p>What&rsquo;s unfortunate for Sony from a business perspective is that it got so caught up in a graphical penis-measuring contest with Microsoft, that it lost sight of the fact that it didn&rsquo;t need a multi-core, 8 SPE pixel generating doomsday device. That&rsquo;s not how it won the last console war and it&rsquo;s why that even in the event they stay on course to take the #2 position behind Nintendo, they will still have lost this generation.  </p>
<p>Now it&rsquo;s reasonable to assume that at least a fair percentage of the 140 million PS2 owners were &ldquo;light&rdquo; owners, buying the occasional game here and there, but in this generation have opted for the Wii to fulfill those gaming needs. What Sony did, however, was totally alienate that consumer, and now it&rsquo;s feeling the pain. &quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyP</title>
		<link>http://blog.gamer20.com/2009/01/doomsayers-ps3-not-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gamer20.com/?p=1227#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>Granted, no one foresaw the economic crises we&#039;re in now way back when the PS3 was released. I do think it was a mistake though since it abandoned the principles that made the PS2 successful. 
 
While the site is under construction, a copy of my editorial&quot;The Fall of Sony: From #1 to (Barely) #2&quot;,  on it is still around at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gamer20.com/features/347,&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.gamer20.com/features/347,&lt;/a&gt; here&#039;s the basic gist: 
 
&quot;What&#8217;s ironic is that it was Microsoft who trumpeted the strategy with the original Xbox that inspired the strategy of the PlayStation 3. Rather than release slightly worse hardware at a lower price, Sony invested millions into its Cell processor technology and all of the other components that caused the PS3 to retail as high as $599 at one point. Sadly, even with the high price Sony was still selling them at a loss. 
 
What&#8217;s unfortunate for Sony from a business perspective is that it got so caught up in a graphical penis-measuring contest with Microsoft, that it lost sight of the fact that it didn&#8217;t need a multi-core, 8 SPE pixel generating doomsday device. That&#8217;s not how it won the last console war and it&#8217;s why that even in the event they stay on course to take the #2 position behind Nintendo, they will still have lost this generation.  
 
Now it&#8217;s reasonable to assume that at least a fair percentage of the 140 million PS2 owners were &#8220;light&#8221; owners, buying the occasional game here and there, but in this generation have opted for the Wii to fulfill those gaming needs. What Sony did, however, was totally alienate that consumer, and now it&#8217;s feeling the pain. &quot; 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted, no one foresaw the economic crises we&#039;re in now way back when the PS3 was released. I do think it was a mistake though since it abandoned the principles that made the PS2 successful. </p>
<p>While the site is under construction, a copy of my editorial&quot;The Fall of Sony: From #1 to (Barely) #2&quot;,  on it is still around at <a href="http://www.gamer20.com/features/347," target="_blank">http://www.gamer20.com/features/347,</a> here&#039;s the basic gist: </p>
<p>&quot;What&rsquo;s ironic is that it was Microsoft who trumpeted the strategy with the original Xbox that inspired the strategy of the PlayStation 3. Rather than release slightly worse hardware at a lower price, Sony invested millions into its Cell processor technology and all of the other components that caused the PS3 to retail as high as $599 at one point. Sadly, even with the high price Sony was still selling them at a loss. </p>
<p>What&rsquo;s unfortunate for Sony from a business perspective is that it got so caught up in a graphical penis-measuring contest with Microsoft, that it lost sight of the fact that it didn&rsquo;t need a multi-core, 8 SPE pixel generating doomsday device. That&rsquo;s not how it won the last console war and it&rsquo;s why that even in the event they stay on course to take the #2 position behind Nintendo, they will still have lost this generation.  </p>
<p>Now it&rsquo;s reasonable to assume that at least a fair percentage of the 140 million PS2 owners were &ldquo;light&rdquo; owners, buying the occasional game here and there, but in this generation have opted for the Wii to fulfill those gaming needs. What Sony did, however, was totally alienate that consumer, and now it&rsquo;s feeling the pain. &quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyP</title>
		<link>http://blog.gamer20.com/2009/01/doomsayers-ps3-not-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gamer20.com/?p=1227#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>Granted, no one foresaw the economic crises we&#039;re in now way back when the PS3 was released. I do think it was a mistake though since it abandoned the principles that made the PS2 successful. 
 
While the site is under construction, a copy of my editorial&quot;The Fall of Sony: From #1 to (Barely) #2&quot;,  on it is still around at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gamer20.com/features/347,&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.gamer20.com/features/347,&lt;/a&gt; here&#039;s the basic gist: 
 
&quot;What&#8217;s ironic is that it was Microsoft who trumpeted the strategy with the original Xbox that inspired the strategy of the PlayStation 3. Rather than release slightly worse hardware at a lower price, Sony invested millions into its Cell processor technology and all of the other components that caused the PS3 to retail as high as $599 at one point. Sadly, even with the high price Sony was still selling them at a loss. 
 
What&#8217;s unfortunate for Sony from a business perspective is that it got so caught up in a graphical penis-measuring contest with Microsoft, that it lost sight of the fact that it didn&#8217;t need a multi-core, 8 SPE pixel generating doomsday device. That&#8217;s not how it won the last console war and it&#8217;s why that even in the event they stay on course to take the #2 position behind Nintendo, they will still have lost this generation.  
 
Now it&#8217;s reasonable to assume that at least a fair percentage of the 140 million PS2 owners were &#8220;light&#8221; owners, buying the occasional game here and there, but in this generation have opted for the Wii to fulfill those gaming needs. What Sony did, however, was totally alienate that consumer, and now it&#8217;s feeling the pain. &quot; 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted, no one foresaw the economic crises we&#039;re in now way back when the PS3 was released. I do think it was a mistake though since it abandoned the principles that made the PS2 successful. </p>
<p>While the site is under construction, a copy of my editorial&quot;The Fall of Sony: From #1 to (Barely) #2&quot;,  on it is still around at <a href="http://www.gamer20.com/features/347," target="_blank">http://www.gamer20.com/features/347,</a> here&#039;s the basic gist: </p>
<p>&quot;What&rsquo;s ironic is that it was Microsoft who trumpeted the strategy with the original Xbox that inspired the strategy of the PlayStation 3. Rather than release slightly worse hardware at a lower price, Sony invested millions into its Cell processor technology and all of the other components that caused the PS3 to retail as high as $599 at one point. Sadly, even with the high price Sony was still selling them at a loss. </p>
<p>What&rsquo;s unfortunate for Sony from a business perspective is that it got so caught up in a graphical penis-measuring contest with Microsoft, that it lost sight of the fact that it didn&rsquo;t need a multi-core, 8 SPE pixel generating doomsday device. That&rsquo;s not how it won the last console war and it&rsquo;s why that even in the event they stay on course to take the #2 position behind Nintendo, they will still have lost this generation.  </p>
<p>Now it&rsquo;s reasonable to assume that at least a fair percentage of the 140 million PS2 owners were &ldquo;light&rdquo; owners, buying the occasional game here and there, but in this generation have opted for the Wii to fulfill those gaming needs. What Sony did, however, was totally alienate that consumer, and now it&rsquo;s feeling the pain. &quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USA BOB</title>
		<link>http://blog.gamer20.com/2009/01/doomsayers-ps3-not-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>USA BOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gamer20.com/?p=1227#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>Bollocks to the UK!! WAAAAAANKERS!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANKERS!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bollocks to the UK!! WAAAAAANKERS!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANKERS!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JacobS</title>
		<link>http://blog.gamer20.com/2009/01/doomsayers-ps3-not-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>JacobS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gamer20.com/?p=1227#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Sony picked a horrible time to bring out the most expensive mainstream console ever though. While Nintendo lost their position by playing it too conservatively, they at least were able to turn a profit. Sony overshot everybody and is paying the price. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony picked a horrible time to bring out the most expensive mainstream console ever though. While Nintendo lost their position by playing it too conservatively, they at least were able to turn a profit. Sony overshot everybody and is paying the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyP</title>
		<link>http://blog.gamer20.com/2009/01/doomsayers-ps3-not-dying/comment-page-/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gamer20.com/?p=1227#comment-414</guid>
		<description>Sony doesn&#039;t have the PS3 priced they way they do because of any assumption that they&#039;re good enough to price it that high, it&#039;s because they have to price it that high or they&#039;ll bleed more money than they already. When the PS3 first game out, it cost a hell of a lot more to produce it than what they were selling it for so they were losing a ton of money on each PS3 sold. Now, they&#039;ve finally got the cost of production down to about the same price as for what they sell it for. 
 
PS3 Hardware May Finally Be Profitable in 09; Price Cut Possible? 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.gamer20.com/2008/12/ps3-hardware-may-finally-be-profitable-in-09-price-cut-possible/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.gamer20.com/2008/12/ps3-hardware-may-...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
The big problem is that it&#039;s kind of hurting  them in the overall console race. I wrote about it in-depth in another article here on Gamer 2.0: 
 
The Fall of Sony: From #1 to (Barely) #2 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gamer20.com/features/347&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.gamer20.com/features/347&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony doesn&#039;t have the PS3 priced they way they do because of any assumption that they&#039;re good enough to price it that high, it&#039;s because they have to price it that high or they&#039;ll bleed more money than they already. When the PS3 first game out, it cost a hell of a lot more to produce it than what they were selling it for so they were losing a ton of money on each PS3 sold. Now, they&#039;ve finally got the cost of production down to about the same price as for what they sell it for. </p>
<p>PS3 Hardware May Finally Be Profitable in 09; Price Cut Possible?<br />
<a href="http://blog.gamer20.com/2008/12/ps3-hardware-may-finally-be-profitable-in-09-price-cut-possible/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.gamer20.com/2008/12/ps3-hardware-may-&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>The big problem is that it&#039;s kind of hurting  them in the overall console race. I wrote about it in-depth in another article here on Gamer 2.0: </p>
<p>The Fall of Sony: From #1 to (Barely) #2<br />
<a href="http://www.gamer20.com/features/347" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamer20.com/features/347</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve o</title>
		<link>http://blog.gamer20.com/2009/01/doomsayers-ps3-not-dying/comment-page-/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>steve o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gamer20.com/?p=1227#comment-413</guid>
		<description>you ps3 fanboys talk alot of shit, but u know what on a serious level jellybalboas and gogos comments make alot of sense to me, in a way it does actually apply to me, coz y the fok should i buy an overpriced ps3 when i can buy an xbox which duz the same shit, and y have they priced it so much, who da fok do sony think day are. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you ps3 fanboys talk alot of shit, but u know what on a serious level jellybalboas and gogos comments make alot of sense to me, in a way it does actually apply to me, coz y the fok should i buy an overpriced ps3 when i can buy an xbox which duz the same shit, and y have they priced it so much, who da fok do sony think day are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gogo</title>
		<link>http://blog.gamer20.com/2009/01/doomsayers-ps3-not-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>gogo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gamer20.com/?p=1227#comment-412</guid>
		<description>or maybe they really love the ps3 but because the price never came down and it was still financially out of their reach, so that love they had turned to hatred and now thats why u see all that sony bashing </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or maybe they really love the ps3 but because the price never came down and it was still financially out of their reach, so that love they had turned to hatred and now thats why u see all that sony bashing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank polsey</title>
		<link>http://blog.gamer20.com/2009/01/doomsayers-ps3-not-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>frank polsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gamer20.com/?p=1227#comment-411</guid>
		<description>yep i think youve hit the nail on the head </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep i think youve hit the nail on the head</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jellybalboa</title>
		<link>http://blog.gamer20.com/2009/01/doomsayers-ps3-not-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>jellybalboa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gamer20.com/?p=1227#comment-410</guid>
		<description>maybe, people have hatred towards the ps3 because maybe they just cant afford it </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe, people have hatred towards the ps3 because maybe they just cant afford it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

